November 28, 2010


The Shame and Scandal of Our Mismanagement of Antibiotics



    The public has so many problems to think about concerning food that one hesitates to raise another problem, but there is currently  a law before Congress that could have the most valuable long-term impact on our health.   This is the  Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act (PAMTA), a bill  that would ban the use of seven classes of medically important antibiotics in livestock and poultry.
    
    The use of antibiotics in farm animals began some time shortly after the Second World War.  While there are good reasons for using antibiotics on farm animals, there are some very bad reasons.  These include using antibiotics  to promote growth in the animals,  and as a sub-therapeutic method to mask poor husbandry. No one knows why, but antibiotics cause cows to grow faster.  A cow which traditionally took four years to reach slaughter weight, may reach reach slaughter weight in eighteen months, if fed antibiotics.  This can save the farmer substantial money in feed and care.  Additionally, farms which raise their cows and chickens according to the CAFO system (Confined Animal Feed Operation) continually  face conditions which threaten disease  outbreaks because they are controlled by constantly feeding  antibiotics to the animals.  The dangerous  effect of this “industrialized farming” of animals is that it weakens the use of antibiotics for human health and increases what has come to be called antibiotic resistant bacteria.

    My first introduction to this problem was reading Orvile Schell’s book, Modern Meat, published in 1983, while working on an article for a local magazine. Through his book, I was introduced to  the work of Dr. Stuart Levy of the Department of Microbiology at Tufts University, who heads the Levy Lab---The Center for Adaptation Genetics and Drug Resistance, and who probably knows  everything you never wanted to know about  microbial life.  In an interview I asked him why we couldn’t just assume that medicine can continually discover new drugs and stay ahead of drug resistance.   “Up to a point,” he said, “but we don’t know what that point is.   Doctors now often feel they are racing to find the next effective antibiotic for a patient  with pneumonia recovering from a heart operation.  Medicine can perform astounding surgery which often goes to waste because of a bacterial infection we have no antibiotic for.”
   
    Since 1983, there have been continual calls to stop the overuse of antibiotics on farm animals.   In 1985, The Harvard University Medical School Health Letter headlined its article: “Antibiotics and Life Stock: Feeding A Controversy.”  In January, 2001, Science Magazine  dedicated its editorial to the problem.  In 2006,  the European Union banned the use of antibiotics as a growth promotant,  as well as the use of those antibiotics useful in human health.  Michael Jacobson of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, has sent emails to its members asking them to contact their  representatives to pass PAMTA.  The Union for Concerned Scientists has some excellent articles on the subject.   Several large meat and chicken manufacturers in the United States, such as  McDonald's,  Tyson  Perdue,  Foster, and Gold Kist have volunteered to stop using antibiotics for growth promotion.
    But this may be too little and too late, and  our government remains timid in passing the legislation to end the promiscuous use of antibiotics in animals---because the CAFO system of raising animals  depends on the massive use of antibiotics, and the CAFO system  would have to be dismantled.  That is not only an agricultural and human health  problem, but a political headache with powerful agricultural lobbies weighing in.

    The use  of antibiotics in animals in 1985, when I wrote my first article,  was about 48%.  It is now about 70%   Yes,  the CAFO system must be dismantled with deliberate speed.    We have not even calculated the impact of global warming on the disease profile of the future, but global warming will inevitably cause changes in microbial life  that will cause changes in  our disease patterns that we have not dreamed of  in our pharmacology.   The discovery of antibiotics was a miracle that we have wasted on frivolous use, and to feed an irresponsible industry that was based on a wanton appetite for meat.   I am haunted by the implications of  Jared Diamond’s book, Collapse---that we may have eaten ourselves into death.


Copyright (c) Roberta Kalechofsky, 2010.





   

   

   









 
26 October 2010
Can A Mad Cow Be Kosher

Halachically, the “fit” or “clean” animals designated for consumption by Jews are the ruminant, vegetarian animals.  A further requirement for kashrut is the traditional examination of the animals’ lungs to determine whether an animal is fit for consumption.  But developments in husbandry practices and in the emerging new pathogens in meat, such as BSE (Mad Cow Disease), campylobacter, and e-coli 1057,  undermines the definition of “fit” or “clean,” and has made the traditional exmaintion of the animals’ lungs irrelevant.  A food animal today can be judged as “kosher” and be unfit for consumption.

 Rabbi Moshe Feinstein recognized this problem in 1982, when he condemned the eating of the veal calf and declared “that it was forbidden [for Jews] to cause suffering to the animal by feeding it food which it does not enjoy and which causes it pain when it is eating, and causes it to suffer illness from which it will suffer pain.”  Unfortunately, all animals raised for the commercial market, kosher and non-kosher, are fed food that is bad for them, and many animals are contracting diseases which traditional kashrut examination cannot detect, nor be detected by traditional USDA inspection methods.

Brains of infected sheep, other sick animals, roadkill, chicken feathers, chicken litter, citrus pulp, sawdust, animal waste, are converted into animal feed for cattle by rendering plants which  are the major producers of animal feed.  Essentially, vegetarian animals are being fed meat protein and turned into carnivores.  Since halachically designated “fit” animals are the vegetarian animals, the question  is whether this designation of “vegetarian” was intended to be structural or functional or both, because animals who have evolved as vegetarians and whose perfect food was grass  have been relocated in the food chain?  Does it matter for kashrut that a vegetarian animal has been transformed into a carnivore?  It apparently matters as a question of the animals’ health and ultimately of human health. 


 Mad cow disease causes the cow to stumble like a drunkard, lose control of her body, appear drunk.  Hence the descriptive term, “mad cow.”  The scientific name is bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE).   The disease is called Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) in human beings.  It causes neurological deterioration, dementia, agonizing muscle spasms, and is always fatal.

The disease is caused by a “prion” or renegate protein, which is impervious to radiation, gamma rays, or freezing, and thus far cannot be destroyed by any known method.  Since symptoms do not appear in animals for as long as two to eight years after infection (usually long after the animal has been slaughtered and eaten) and not for four--to thirty years in humans, predictability of its course is difficult and we will not know the ultimate toll  of BSE for some time to come.

 Rabbi  Feinstein, aware that traditional investigation of the cows’ lungs was inadequate for diagnosing new animal pathogens, recommended that the intestines of veal calves be examined as well as their lungs, though this was not traditional.  Since 1982, the dichotomy between “kosher” meat and unhealthy meat has widened further.  Inspection of lungs or of intestines may not yield the necessary information to determine whether an animal’s meat is unhealthy.  In 1989, Rabbi David Rosen condemned all meat raised according to the factory farming method.  His arguments were based on the problems of feeding antibiotics and hormones to animals because these are retained in the animal’s flesh and passed on to the consumer, and represent a violation of pikuach nefesh.

"Today as never before the cruelty in livestock trade renders meat eating and true kashrut incompatible....If meat eating were a mitzvah--an obligation--it would today in most cases be at best a ‘mitzvah haba’ah b’averah’ or rather ‘b’averot’--i.e. rendered illegitimate by illegitimate means."


In addition to the hazards caused by the use of antibiotics and hormones in meat--kosher and otherwise--there are the dangers of camphylobacter, a potentially fatal disease which causes nerve damage, and e-coli: 1057, which can result in kidney failure and fatality.  Once confined to animal manure, which is its source, and to rare hamburger meat, e-coli:1057 has now spread through the food chain and has infected even vegetables which are grown in soil that has been contaminated with cow feces infected with e-coli:1057.

Food borne  diseases are more easily contracted than AIDS, because you can do without sex or practise safe sex, but you cannot do without food or practice “safe food” if a contaminant is spread throughout the food chain.

   

 For almost a century, all that has been left of shechitah is the means by which the animal is killed during the last few minutes of its life--and even here there are violations in the use of shackling and hoisting of conscious animals, a process which is extremely painful to the animal.  Though this process has now been replaced in many kosher slaughtering houses where large animals, cows and bulls, are slaughtered, it is still used, as of this writing, in slaughtering houses where small animals, goats and lambs, are slaughtered.

The Jewish claim that shechitah was  the most merciful way to kill a food animal was true for millennia, and its practice was the symbol of Jewish guardianship over animals.  The terms ‘fit’ and ‘clean’ were understood as pledges  of the maintenance of Jewish law for every observant Jewish household,  and of the applicability of halacha to the present life  of Jews.  Today  shechitah, wherever commercial meat is sold in western countries, is the ghost of this great tradition.


Copyright (c) Roberta Kakechofsky, 2010


Posted by rkalechofsky at 2:21 PM in Kosher Meat in the Modern World | Link

There are no comments for this entry.

Post a comment (login required)
Subscription Options
You are not logged in, so your subscription status for this entry is unknown. You can login or register here.

<< May, 2012 >>
SMTWTFS
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Search Entries
Recent Entries
Recent Comments
None
Categories
Archives
RSS 1.0 Feeds
Main feed - latest 15 entries.
Category feeds:
Antibiotics
Diet As Philosophy
Kosher Meat in the Modern World